Advertisements:




Single Ssd With Raid 0 Spinning Drives


I a question concerning a raid (stripe) partition. I have 3 drives in my system. A ssd 30gb vertex (that windows 7 is on). A 640 wd blue and a 1tb wd black

What im wanting to do is create a raid array out of those 2 spinning disks just for data storage. Likely 3 partitons, which would be a total of little over 1100gb. After i install win7 on the ssd. I was thinking maybe like 35gb partition for the docs/temp/page file (i moved all temp, and pagefile off the ssd). 400gb partition for games
And remaining 700 and something for videos/music

If i create this all based on the 640gb drive, that should leave 300ish gb unallocated on the 1tb drive. Will i be able to use that unallocated space for acronis secure zone back up area, even though it will not be a raid, or will i just loose all that space all together. I was going to use the intel matrix storage also if that matters.


View Full Post With 1 Replies

Related Forum Messages:

Please Follow Index to Quick Jump to the Message.


Single Ssd Drive To Raid 0

I got an extra 60gb vertex ssd for christmas. I am wanting to put them in raid 0 configuration. The issue is i already have a 60gb vertex ssd as my main os drive. Is there an easy way to migrate from a single ssd to raid 0 configuration without having to do a complete reinstall?

Posted On: 01-03-2010, 04:55 PM . View Related Posts . . View 7 Replies .

Raid-0 Current Drives Or Faster Single ?

Been a long time since i've added new hardware to my machine (long for me anyway). Have been getting my modding fix with the car for the past year or so. Anyway, i am looking on upgrading the hd portion of the computer. Current drives are listed in sig, consisting of two wd 320gb (single platter) drives and a wd 500gb. I am debating on either putting the two current wd320gb drives in a raid-0 config, which i prefer, assuming they will be the fastest option. The other choice would be to go with something like a larger single drive such as a samsung f3. For the two drives in raid-0, i am in need of a good cheap hardware controller, which is a piece of hardware i really don't have much knowledge about. So i am stuck at either finding a cheap hardware controller or if the cost it to great then jumping to a single larger drive. What are your thoughts/opinions? Can anyone recommend a controller making these two drives worth staying with?

Posted On: 01-18-2010, 10:43 AM . View Related Posts . . View 4 Replies .

Single Intel X-25m Vs Ocz Vertex Drives In Raid 0

I'm trying to decide whether or not to purchase a single intel x-25m 80gb gen. 2 drive or two ocz vertex 60gb ssd drives that i'd configure in raid 0. One of the primary selling points of the intel x-25m is it's random read/write speed, which tends to be what your os does most of the time in its daily activities. I know the ocz vertex along with pretty much every other non-intel drive can't compare to the intel in this area. However, i'm wondering if anyone has any experience or knowledge of how much random read/write performance of the vertex would improve as a result of a raid 0 configuration. Would it bring it up to speed of a single intel x-25m drive, or would it still not compare. Does raid even help in this area, or does it primarily boost sequential read/writes?

Posted On: 08-30-2009, 02:03 PM . View Related Posts . . View 9 Replies .

Ahci Ssd Os And Raid 1 Data Drives P6td Setup

Not sure how this would be configured in the bios or whether it can be done. Requirements: os drive must support trim

Question: how should the bios be configured to support this arrangement. Enable ahci in the bios? Or should it be set to raid? If set to raid does the trim/ahci functionality in windows 7 still work for the ssd drive? If it is set to ahci can i set up a raid data drive?

Build: windows 7 ultimate 64bit
P6td deluxe (asus) board. 80gig intel ssd x-25 g2
2 x 1 tb segate sata drives
Sata lg dvd burner

Would like the ssd for c:(os)
And the 2 segate drives as mirrored data drives.


Posted On: 12-03-2009, 02:44 PM . View Related Posts . . View 4 Replies .

Ssd Raid Vs V-raptor Vs Wd-green Raid

Just felt like throwing these benchs from my system out there. 2 x corsair p128 ssd raid0 vs 1 x 300 tb v-raptor vs 3 x 2tb wd-"green" raid0

Posted On: 09-14-2009, 01:52 AM . View Related Posts . . View 19 Replies .

Raid 5 Along With A Single Hard Drive

Is it possible to have vista on a single hard drive, and a raid5 system (3 hdds) on the same sata controller? If so, how do i set one up?

Posted On: 07-23-2009, 04:59 PM . View Related Posts . . View 3 Replies .

Raid 5 Performance Versus Single Drive

Assuming we have a decent hardware raid controller from areca/3ware. Is the read/write speed in a raid5 setup with 4 or 8 drives is always faster than single drive?

Posted On: 03-17-2010, 11:12 AM . View Related Posts . . View 5 Replies .

Moving From Raid 0 To 1tb Sata Ii Single Drive

When i built my current high performance rig last october, i noticed the raid0 performance kinda sucked. The benchmark score on these old 80gig drives are nowhere near up to par with a new sataii drive. So i just ordered a 1tb western digital wd10eads drive. I plan to ghost the the raid0 to this new drive and then remove the raid setup all together. Anyone done something similar recently? The performance advantages now a days with raid0 is questionable. Storage bandwidth with sata ii more than makes up for any performance gain from striping 2 drives. The idea originally was drop frame free video capturing on a pc. But times have changed. Dv capture need sustained 3. 4mb/s throughput. That is a drop in the bucket now! But in the old days it was hard to achieve on a system with out raid0.

Posted On: 06-19-2009, 11:01 AM . View Related Posts . . View 15 Replies .

Os Drive - Short Stroked .12 In Raid 0, Or Ssd ?

I'm in the upgrade process, and am building an i7 computer that will be running windows 7 and be used primarily for br ripping, encoding and editing, as well as gaming. My question is, due to the relatively high prices of a ssd right now (i see most ~60gb ssd going for ~120-180), would it be worth it to get two of the new . 12 500gb platter seagates, short stroke them, and put them in raid 0? For example, buying two of these: seagate 1tb 7200. 12, short stroking them to 100gb / disk, then putting them in raid 0 running together. Because it's using the outer layer, how would that performance compare to a raptor or, say, a ssd?

The reason for asking this is i also have a lot of storage, and will be needing to upgrade my storage in probably 6-8 months or so. If i went ahead and bought the 1tb seagates, used them for the os, then later on down the road (when ssd get a tad cheaper / gb), pop the seagates into my storage computer, and buy a ssd to replace the os drive. What kind of differences will i be seeing? One of the major problems i think i will run into is that i will be picking up aion to see how it is (~10gb starting, without patches), having the os (what is win7, 8 gb or so?), Main programs ie photoshop, ripping software, conversion software, etc, and that's about it. I don't *think* i'll need more than 60gb, but i would prefer to at least get 120gb ssd if i was going to go that route, but for the cost, it doesn't seem worth it with the rate of technological improvements in ssd/hdd recently. Edit: just curious, when ripping / encoding videos, it is beneficial to have a source file on one hdd and the dest file on a different hdd, correct? Ie, having the source on the os drive, encoding it to a secondary hdd, then erasing/moving the source to the dest?


Posted On: 08-25-2009, 03:08 PM . View Related Posts . . View 6 Replies .

Do I Need Raid Enabled Drives For Software / Firmware Raid ?

First off, i am completely aware of the fact that you need a re drive with tler enabled for correct hardware raid. My question though is tler needed for software (windows and linux) or firmware (onboard or fakeraid) raid setups? Will these implementations drop a hdd if it spends too much time correcting a read/write error?

In a single drive scenario, the drive will attempt to read/write the same sector for up to 60 seconds and then remap it if possible. In a hardware raid scenario, the controller will tell the failed drive to remap to a new sector with data from a good redundant drive (raid 0 not apply here). My second question is if indeed you do need a tler enabled drive because the controller will drop the hdd, then what will handle read/write errors? Will these software/firmware raid controllers do the same error recovery?

If there is no error recovery, it would seem that software/firmware raid are just bad news. This is esp true for firmware raid which would seem to have all the downsides of the other controller types and none of the benefits. Third question deals with ssds. Are there only certain ones qualified for raid and 24x7 usage? I have not seen a distinction like i have with hdds. Also, are these going to work properly in a raid 5, as the controller will want to try and fix any errors like they are hdds, yet the ssds have very good internal error correction.


Posted On: 07-19-2009, 08:20 AM . View Related Posts . . View 3 Replies .

Hardware Raid Recommendations For Running 3 Intel X25e Ssd

I am getting 3 intel x25e ssd's and am planning on running them in raid0. There are so many raid adapters out there and i'm not sure whether to go with 3ware, adaptec, etc. Also sas cards will work with sata drives, right? Cause in that case i would probably prefer to buy an sas card to help me in the long run if i keep this card for a long time. I'm looking for something thats at least pci-e 4x. But when it comes to intel ssd's, should i go w/ 8x? Or are most server level cards at 8x already? Do areca cards work well with intel ssd's? Are there any known compatibility issues with raid cards and ssd's?

Why 3? 4 will be coming soon. This is for an all in one gaming/office rig. Serious replies only.


Posted On: 08-20-2009, 08:37 PM . View Related Posts . . View 19 Replies .

Ssd And Standard Drives

So i'll be building a new computer in the next week or so and i have most of the parts ordered. I have been using a western digital caviar green wd10eads 1tb 32mb as an external drive hooked up to my laptop and my plan was to use it as my boot drive in the new build. However seeing as the rest of my system is reasonably high end (at least by my standards some of you guys are nuts) i thought it may be slightly on the slow side to run windows. I don't have a ton more money to spend as the rest of the parts have cleaned me out so my options are:

A) pick up another wd10eads 1tb and run them in raid 0
Or
B) buy a ssd such as the ocz vertex series 30gb

I've never owned a ssd so please forgive my noobness. I did search around but was unable to find the answers to a few specific questions i have regarding my situation. 30gigs wont cover my needs for os, programs, and games but it's all i can afford in a ssd right now. Between windows 7 and a 10 gig world of warcraft install i don't think i'd even have room left over for the cs4 suite let alone the laundry list of other games i want to install. So would i be better off with my os on the ssd and programs, games, and media on the wd 1tb or everything on 2 of the wb 1tb in raid 0?

Heres my setup so far:

I7 920 /w corsair h20
Evga x58 sli le
Xfx 5870
G. Skill 6gb ddr3 triple channel


Posted On: 12-30-2009, 12:03 AM . View Related Posts . . View 19 Replies .

Intel G2 Ssd Drives

I always thought the intel g2 drives were the fastest. But after looking at the specs it writes only up to 70mb? That's pretty crappy compared to ocz where its 150mb. Why do people say the intel drives are the fastest? The reads on the ocz by the specs anyway show that they are faster at both read and write.

Posted On: 02-18-2010, 09:40 PM . View Related Posts . . View 19 Replies .

Raid 10 Or Raid 1 And Which Drives - For Storage

I am currently building my storage server and need some help with my decisions. I would like to get some 2tb drives in a raid array. I have narrowed down my choices to either a raid 10 array using 4 drives, or just a basic raid 1 with 2 drives plus a hot spare for a 3 drive array. Both would give me 4tb of space, and while raid 10 may not give me a big enough performance gain to warrent the price of a fouth drive it does give me the potential to loose 2 drives without data loss. This will be for streaming large (~5-10gb) files across an internal gigabit network. The questions i pose for the masses:

Which-

1) array do you think will work best for my situation, and causes me the least amount of issues? I am not worried about the price of a fourth drive, that is not the concern with raid 1, its ease of use. 2) drives do you guys recommend? I am talking sata desktop class drives, and i have heard nothing but bad things about wd green drives when put in an array. I think both of my raid choices are fairly basic, but i do want to want rebuild array on a regular basis due to drop outs or other crazyness. 3) raid controller card do you recommend? I do not need full harware raid, nor do i want the price tag of one. The server will not get beat up that bad to worry about the cpu tax from an economy level controller.


Posted On: 01-07-2010, 01:08 PM . View Related Posts . . View 8 Replies .

Separate Ssd Drives For Os And Apps

For years i have been using 3 drives in my systems, 1 for os, 1 for apps, and 1 for docs and page file. Does one see the same benefits when using ssd drives? Or does the increased sdd performance obviate dividing functions by drive? I am going to take the ssd plunge with about $350 dollars to spend. Would i be better off with:

1 30g vertex (os) + 1 60g vertex (apps)

Or

1 80g x25-m (os + apps)?

I have lots of ram. Should i put the page-file on an ssd or leave on a spindle drive?


Posted On: 06-02-2009, 10:58 AM . View Related Posts . . View 15 Replies .

Imation / Mtron Ssd Drives Question

I have a chance to get either:

- 64gb imation ssd pro 7500 3. 5" hdd's (8 or less for 10 bucks each)
- 32gb imation ssd pro 7500 2. 5" hdd's (8 or more for 15 bucks each)
- 32gb imation ssd pro 7500 3. 5" hdd's (8 or more for 8 bucks each)

I will either get a nice raid controller, or just go with 4 in raid 0 on a rocketraid 2300 that i already have, and the other 4 on the ich10r on my gigabyte board. Which of them should i get. I know the 64gb is the obvious choice, but is there a benefit to the 32gb 2. 5", or does the 32gb 3. 5" out perform the 64gb 3. 5" one. Also, a 128gb 3. 5" is on backorder currently, and i could get that for $16 each. Ps- dont ask where i am getting these, but they also may be up in the classy's later if i can get them this cheap (seeing whats what at work)


Posted On: 07-08-2009, 08:25 PM . View Related Posts . . View 2 Replies .

Ssd Drives 64gb Or Lower For Under $200

Are there any good ssd drives 64gb or lower for under $200? Not sure what to get, i do not install much, my windows 7 64bit install right now is only 35gb and i doubt i will ever hit 50gb as i don't game anymore.

Posted On: 10-21-2009, 03:25 PM . View Related Posts . . View 11 Replies .

Solid State Drives (ssd) Is Not As Fast As I Thought

I found a video that shows you how fast a ssd loads xp vs a regular hd. Although the type of hd is not clear. But when viewing the video the hd only lags behind the ssd (which is very expensive). Here watch the video and see for yourself, is the cost of ssd worth what they are asking for?

Posted On: 02-24-2007, 04:11 AM . View Related Posts . . View 24 Replies .

Ocz Summit, Vertex, Other Ssd Drives - Recommendations

I'm looking to replace my boot drive (currently a hitachi f1 1tb) with a 128 gb ssd, but don't know enough about controllers and stuff currently to feel comfy buying one blind. What do you guys recommend?

Posted On: 07-25-2009, 04:23 PM . View Related Posts . . View 13 Replies .

Areca 1680ix Time Out Error With Ssd Drives

I recently purchased and installed an areca 1680ix-12 raid controller on my new system. I am using an asus p6t deluxe v2 with a core i7 920 processor & 12gigs of kingston hyperx. I have 5 super talent ssdís (ftm16gl25h) configured in a raid 5 on the areca. I was able to create and build the array without any trouble. I started the win7 installation and when prompted installed the storport driver for the areca. Iím using the win7 x64 driver from the areca website. Everything started fine. However, the installation eventually error out during the "expanding files" stage. Somewhere around 29%. I took a look at the event viewer on the areca and i noticed that the ssd drives were the issue. It showed that the ssdís encountered a "time out error". The array was still in a "normal" not "degraded" state. Thinking that something must have gone wrong along the way. I deleted the array, rebuilt it again and attempted to reinstall win7. The same thing happened. The install errored out again. This time it got to 13% before failing. Checked the logsame thingtime out error on the drives. So, i decided to do some further testing. I have a 4 disk san running seagate sas mechanical drives. I connected it to the areca and installed win7 without any issues. Iíve been running the system like this for a week and itís stable. For another test i booted the computer from the san. Went into the disk manager and selected the earlier created ssd raid 5 array. I formatted it and then attempted to transfer a large file to it. The transfer started fine but eventually locked up my computer. Booted my netbook, went into the areca controllers http interface, checked the event viewer and sure enoughtime out errors on the ssd drives again. Are there known issues with ssdís on areca raid controllers?

Iíve been researching the heck out of this situation and i can't find any. I've updated all the firmware files on the controller as well as the bios on the mother board. Also, i checked the firmware version in the ssdís and it's the current one listed on the super talent website. I've tweaked every setting i can possibly think of the on the controller to no avail. Help please?

Oh yea, here's another fun fact, the ssdís run fine on the mother boards ich10r controller in a raid 5 array. Now if i could just get them to work on the areca!


Posted On: 12-10-2009, 08:36 PM . View Related Posts . . View 11 Replies .

Raid 0+1 With Three Drives

Shortly, i'm going to have an extra 1tb drive. Currently, my desktop has a raid-1 of two 500gb drives (specs in profile). Does anyone know if it is possible to do a setup where the two 500gb drives would function as a raid-0 stripe, and the 1tb drive could mirror the stripe? If anyone has any information, i'd appreciate it.

Posted On: 12-26-2009, 06:28 PM . View Related Posts . . View 5 Replies .

Raid 5 With None 24/7 Drives

I simply have nothing but trouble trying to get opensolaris working with my hardware so iam tempted to just go hardware raid5 with my lsi 8 port controller and my 1tb wd gp drives but is it very unsafe to do without raid drives rated for 24/7 usages? I would start with 7 drives but would add another in a short time so all my 8 ports are filled.

Posted On: 09-09-2009, 01:42 PM . View Related Posts . . View 3 Replies .

Unstriping Raid Drives

I have two wd80bb drives striped on an eio ap1680 raid card. I would like to unstripe the drives so that i can use them individually in separate machines. When i have removed one drive and reconnected to the mobo ide controller i cannot reformat the drive either through fdisk or during the xp installation process. Am i missing something? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

Posted On: August 24th, 2003, 05:35 AM . View Related Posts . . View 7 Replies .

Mixing Different Drives In Raid

I have some problems with my wd15eads drive (smart reports errors) and i want to change it. I don't want to take wd and i want to move to seagate.systems used freenas and zfs

My questions:

1)is it okay to mix drives from different manufacturers?
2)is it okay to mix 5400rpm drives with 7200rpm drives?
3)what about mixing 32mb cache drives with 64mb cache drives?


Posted On: 02-15-2010, 03:41 AM . View Related Posts . . View 7 Replies .

Using Desktop Drives For Raid

The thing about a home raid system is that you're not an enterprise with a multi-million dollar it budget, so the cost of the drives does matter. You just want a good, safe place to put all your pictures, personal files, and music. And if you're like me you think it'd be just grand if you could rip your 1000+ dvd/blu-ray collection and play them all from your home theater screen using something like this. The thing is, you can build a state of the art server/raid array combo for quite a reasonable price these days. The thing that really adds up are the drives. So you buy an enterprise class raid card capable of raid-6 (and later on raid-60) which means that two drives can catastrophically fail without suffering data loss. To me that's a great reason to use cheaper desktop class drives (remember that while we don't want to lose data, we're not a massive-budget enterprise either). Of course the biggest issue we run into using these type of drives in combination with an enterprise class raid card is the time limited error recovery issue (tler aka cctl). So we want to pick our drives carefully. Unfortunately there is nothing so nice as wdtler available for any drives but western digital; and they are actually so greedy (for you to buy their 2x priced enterprise drives, even for a simple home raid) that not only did they change firmware to prevent the utility from permanently changing the settings-they actually went out of spec and disabled s. M. A. R. T. Sct error recovery functionality as well. Which is enough reason for me to never consider patronizing them again. Which brought me to seagate vs hitachi vs samsung. Seagate has had some ridiculous horror stories recently after their acquisition of maxtor (is anyone really surprised?) And as much as i have been a huge fan in the past i just couldn't bring myself to trust that their latest generation of drives meet muster. Samsung on the other hand seems to have a very small market share, and generally little information available on the internet. Which leaves hitachi (aka ibm). But not really, because ibm drives basically sucked. But apparently after hitachi took over ibm's had drive division things really improved. You can find posts on the internet saying ". I will never buy from this manufacturer again because the drive i ordered was doa. " For pretty much every single drive/manufacturer out there. But for hitachi's recent lines the level of satisfaction seems to be quite high (compared especially to seagate). Soo. I have decided to give them a try. Besides, they have tons of detailed documentation and utilities available on their website (see below). Therefore, i have purchased 8 hitachi 7k2000 drives for use in a raid-6 array on an adaptec 5085 adapter. This should give me just shy of 11 usable terabytes (2tb really means 1. 8 and raid-6 being n-2 so 6*1. 8)-a great start. Without getting into system details (which for now doesn't matter much) i will add to the discussion with what i have learned. First and foremost, the adaptec card cannot even finish a build/verify on the raid-6 without one of the drives dropping (having done nothing but hook up the raid box to the adapter and attempt to create a raid). This was somewhat surprising, as i did check each drive's s. M. A. R. T. Attributes (using smartctl 5. 38, from gparted live) prior to insertion in the raid box and everything is fine. I knew i would have to address the cctl (aka tler) issue; i just didn't think it would affect me right out of the gate. So, currently this is what i'm doing and why:

1) use the hitachi feature tool to:

1a) disable the write cache on each drive. This is because the raid card should be the one managing writes; and when it performs a write, it should do so with the expectation that each drive has actually written the data right then and there. This prevents a situation where a power loss to the raid box could result in data loss that the adapter/os would never be aware of. Additionally, the erc write timeout value should not have to be set (this is a good thing, follow the links below on sct write timeout specification as to why). And yes, the adaptec card has an option for supposedly disabling write cache on all connected drives, but to be safe i'll force it on the drive side. 1b) enable power management with value 128 (0x80). As i am planning on using this array in a home environment, allowing the drives to reach idle states will save a substantial amount of electricity, furthermore the raid card *should* be capable of spin-down as well, adding further to potential savings. Dollar-wise the savings pale in comparison to the cost of the drives, but since there is no actual need (in my application) to have them constantly running at full power, it is still a good idea. 2) use the hitachi drive fitness test to perform an advanced test on each drive (this takes hours) to verify that each drive is truly in prime condition. The above mentioned tools are available at the following url:

http://www.Hitachigst.com/hdd/support/download.htm

Now, after having done all of this there should (theoretically) be one final step, and that is to set a read erc timeout. I won't finish performing advanced tests on all drives until a few days hence, so for now i will just add what information i have learned, and later update with results. So the first tool i came across for changing sct error recovery values is the famed hdat2. It works, you can plug the drive directly into an sata port and access it, change the value for read timeout to 70 (7000 ms/7s) and it sticks through reboot. The problem is, i haven't figured out any way to use it while the drive is plugged into the raid box and that box is connected to the adaptec 5085. If anyone knows how please let me know and i'll try it just to let people know. In the meantime, since values changed via s. M. A. R. T. Sct do not keep after power has been removed (e.g. Unplug the drive from the direct connection to the computer and plug it back into the raid box) it is not a very useful tool for my purposes. After all, if you have the drives directly connected to your computer (not using a hardware raid card) you will likely want to use zfs, and then read/write timeout values will be a non-issue anyway. The other issue with the hdat2 approach is that inevitably your raid box will lose power at some point (even if you have a ups, which i do). Reasons include moving equipment, long term power failure, etc. Lets face it, we're building the raid because we want a highly reliable, low administration, home storage network. Having drives revert after power loss and having to remember to re-run an application doesn't meet that criteria. Having a service on server boot check (and if necessary set) those values however does. Which is why i have extremely high hopes for this. I haven't gotten around to porting his patch to smartmontools 5. 39 yet, but if it works as advertised i'll be able to have a simple script run on server boot that checks the read recovery timeout value, and if necessary sets it to 70. I will post back later with my experience once i have all my drives tested and have tried this. For information on error recovery control, and specifically the sct commands to set timeouts see:-

http://www.T13.org/documents/uploadeddocuments/docs2008/d1699r6a-ata8-acs.pdf

For specification information on the 7k2000 series drives (including additional specific information for sct commands) see:-

http://www.Hitachigst.com/tech/techlib. Nsf/techdocs/5f2dc3b35ea0311386257634000284ad/$file/7k2000_a7k2000_spec_r1. 0.pdf


Posted On: 01-18-2010, 04:17 PM . View Related Posts . . View 12 Replies .

6 Drives For A Raid Array

I have been out of the hd loop lately, doing a new server for work, and yes sas is out of the question due to cost, i was able to get a nice raid card, arc-1680ix-16. So with that i need some good sata drives to go with it in the 500g or larger range. For now i have 6 segate 500g es2 drives that will be temporarily used, but will go to another older server once i move things over, so i need some replacement drives. I know wd has "raid" edition drives and such, and i have heard here and there of certain drives wont play nice in raid and so on, so i want to get some recommendations from people who have used 6 or more drives in raid 50, 60 or 10 and had no issues.

Posted On: 06-03-2009, 09:47 PM . View Related Posts . . View 11 Replies .

Raid Zero For The Os With 2 Data Drives

I have a dell xps system. I have two wd 640gb caviar black drives. I also have two 500 gb wd blue drives, and a 1tb black drive by wd, so i guess i need a raid controller, for the two 640gb blacks to set up raid zero

Do i need anything else for the data drives? Or can i use the connections on my motherboard? What do i look for when buying a raid controller? Can anyone recommend one?


Posted On: 10-10-2009, 12:20 AM . View Related Posts . . View 12 Replies .

Slow Hard Drives, Raid 0

I have 2 wd800jd (or soemthing like that) and one's an se and one's not, but there's no difference except for the fact that one's older, but they're still the same thing and later they renamed the drive. So why is my raid 0 slower than a standard 5, 400rpm hard drive? Is it the model thing, because this is unbelievable. Startups are like a normal computer (but mine's high-end, it should be faster) and i've recreated the raid array 3 times so far, but it's always slow in sisoftware sandra. It's really annoying.

Posted On: 10-25-2005, 03:36 AM . View Related Posts . . View 14 Replies .

Looking To Raid 0 New Vertex Drives, But Have A 780i

So i couldn't resist any longer. I just bought 2 ocz vertex 60 gig drives, and i plan on setting them up raid 0 and loading windows 7 on them. I did my research as far as setting them up, but i noticed that the nvidia chipset, well, sucks a lot of ass for raid, and that's putting it nicely. I'm really sort of screwed with my options as well. I like my 780i, haven't had any problems, but i'm not going to pay a lot of money, be an early adopter, and not get the performance i should out of these drives. So option one is to dump my motherboard for one with ich10r. Problem with that is i run sli, which i don't want to get rid of, and i think there is only one board i've found (gigabyte) that can do sli, but both pcie slots are 2. 0 x 16. They are 20. 16/8. Option 2 is to just go i7, but i'm not ready to take that plunge yet. I'd have to get another motherboard, processor, and unless i get the new evga board that is $299, i'd have to sell my gtx 260's and buy some ati cards to crossfire. Lots of money i don't really want to drop on top of the $420 i just spent. Sure, i could sell my old stuff, but that probably wouldn't even make up half the price of the new stuff. Option 3, and the one i'm leaning towards, is to get a perc5i pcie hardware raid controller. I have a question though, to those of you who use these and have sli. Will it fit underneath the sli bridge? I had a fatality sound card that just barely made it, and from the looks of the 5i, it might be a tad taller. I know my 780i has a lot of room, but with two double slot cards, i only have the middle slots open for any other card i want to put in there. Edit

Oh, and will the 5i work well (or at all) with windows 7? I heard the drivers can be an issue. Bah, i'm so bitter, i really like my 780i. Any thoughts?


Posted On: 04-15-2009, 05:38 PM . View Related Posts . . View 12 Replies .